UN Framework Convention On International Tax
Treasury
AI summary
Treasury released the International Chamber of Commerce's response to draft issues notes for a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. The ICC commentary addresses two workstreams: the first developing the framework convention text on fair tax allocation, dispute resolution, and sustainable development support; the second focusing on a protocol for taxing cross-border digital services income. The ICC emphasizes foundational tax principles—including tax certainty, taxpayer rights, and predictability—should precede commitment drafting to prevent fragmentation and deadlocks. It supports fair, independent dispute mechanisms with taxpayer participation, cautions against subjective "fairness" debates on taxing rights allocation, and proposes establishing a Technical Business Advisory Council with 20 business representatives (four per UN region) to ensure balanced input and transparency. The ICC stresses any new taxing rights approach must cohere with existing frameworks and that policy should support sustainable growth and cross-border investment amid growing complexity in international tax rules.
Document text
Show extracted text (6,181 chars)
NOTE: Fully redacted pages have been deleted FOI 4214 Document 1 # ICC's response to the INC Co-Leads' Draft Issues Notes Workstream I Workstream I of INC/Tax is charged with developing the draft text of the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. - It outlines potential commitments on topics such as fair allocation of taxing rights, dispute prevention and resolution, and support for sustainable development. - The draft emphasizes the need to agree on foundational tax principles to avoid fragmentation and ensure predictability in global tax cooperation. ## ICC General Comments: - Emphasises the need to define fundamental tax principles before drafting commitments or protocols. These include: - Tax certainty for stable investment decisions - Recognition of taxpayer rights and safeguards - Concern: Current work plan prioritizes drafting commitments without clearly incorporating these principles, risking an unbalanced framework. - ICC urges the UN to focus on universal agreement on principles of taxation to ensure predictability and avoid future negotiation deadlocks. 9 10 # Workstream I ## Specific Comments & Recommendations The ICC specific comments: - Support inclusion of tax dispute prevention and resolution mechanisms that are fair, independent, accessible, and effective. - Strongly recommend taxpayer participation in design and implementation enhance legitimacy, provide crucial factual and operational clarifications, and ensure solutions reflect real-world business models. - Caution against opening broad, undefined debates on “fair allocation of taxing rights”, as fairness is subjective and risks delaying progress. - Stress tax certainty must be explicitly included as a guiding principle, as it is critical for predictability, investment, and avoiding disputes or double taxation. - Note any new approach to allocation of taxing rights must be coherent with existing frameworks. - Propose establishment of a Technical Business Advisory Council: - 20 business representatives from all UN regions (4 per region) - Ensures balanced input from developed and developing countries - Chair of INC should hold consultations and publish reports to maintain transparency. 11 Workstream II of INC/Tax is charged with developing the first early protocol, on the “taxation of income derived from the provision of cross-border services in an increasingly digitalized and globalized economy.” It highlights diverging national practices (e.g., gross-basis WHT vs. net-basis taxation), debates over economic nexus and value creation, and the need for future-proof, administrable rules that balance source and residence taxing rights. ICC General Comments: - Reiterate the need to define fundamental tax principles before drafting commitments or protocols. - Emphasize that policy should foster sustainable growth, job creation, and cross-border investment. - Express concern over growing complexity in international tax rules, particularly proposals for sectoral taxes and gross-basis withholding taxes (WHT) on services. 12 # Workstream II ## Specific Comments & Recommendations ### The ICC specific comments: - Highlight concerns with sectoral taxes and gross-basis WHT on services: - Ignores cost/value of services, reducing investment returns and raising double taxation risks. - Increases upfront business costs, deters reinvestment, and raises consumer prices. - Disproportionately impacts small companies and startups with thin margins. ### Underscore: - A need for an economic nexus approach, ensuring taxing rights are grounded in substantial engagement, not mere revenue collection. - Cost-sharing arrangements without mark-up should be exempted from WHT to avoid unjustified tax burdens. - Bilateral tax treaties are essential tools preventing double taxation and facilitating trade – they are not barriers to taxation. - WHT rates require careful bilateral negotiation, particularly for support services between developing countries, due to varied industry margins. - Reiterates that fragmentation and lack of legal certainty threaten the success of the UN Tax Framework Convention and early protocols. 13 # Workstream III Workstream III of INC/Tax is charged with developing the second early protocol, on the “prevention and resolution of tax disputes.” - It identifies inefficiencies and inequities in current mechanisms (e.g., limited access to MAP or arbitration), especially for countries with small treaty networks. - Explores tools like cooperative compliance, APAs, mediation, and the possibility of a universal protocol with optional elements to enhance legal certainty, build trust, and reduce litigation risks. # ICC General Comments: - Welcome reference to effective prevention and resolution of tax disputes, recognising it as essential to enhance cross-border trade, investment, and domestic resource mobilisation. - Strongly agree on the need for mechanisms that are: - Fair, independent, accessible, and effective - Designed to resolve disputes efficiently and prevent them from arising through predictability and clarity. - Note that effective prevention reduces administrative burdens and compliance costs for both taxpayers and tax authorities. 14 # Workstream III ## Specific Comments & Recommendations ### The ICC specific comments: #### Support: - Advance legal certainty through clear rules and early guidance; - Cooperative compliance models building trust between taxpayers and authorities; - Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and rulings to prevent disputes before they arise; - Inclusion of arbitration, mediation, and ADR tools as timely, cost-effective alternatives to litigation. - Underscore the taxpayer’s critical role in: - Providing factual clarifications - Helping resolve disputes efficiently. - Call for clarity on how new mechanisms will interact with existing ones (e.g. Mutual Agreement Procedure, treaty arbitration, domestic remedies). - Further clarification on optionality needed to maximise certainty for taxpayers. - Reiterate proposal for a Business Advisory Council to ensure solutions remain practical and effective in real business contexts.